Review

All articles shall undergo blind peer review. The review process is conducted in a closed format: the manuscript of the article is sent to reviewers through the electronic platform of the Journal in a form in which information about the authors is not indicated. Reviewers clearly, objectively and reasonably evaluate the compliance of the manuscript with the requirements of the Journal and scientific criteria.

The reviewer shall be entitled to notify the editors or refuse to review if the topic of the article is not in his area of expertise or quick review is impossible. Authors are required to provide reliable results of original research and an objective discussion of its significance.

The results of the review are confidential and not subject to disclosure. Reviewers, if there is a conflict of interest, are not allowed to review the article.

Depending on the outcomes of technical verification and peer review, the article can either be rejected, sent to the authors for revision, or accepted for publication. Upon receiving a positive review, the editors notify the authors that the article will be accepted for publication. In case of comments from reviewers and editors, the author must correct and supplement the article within the specified time frame.