In general, in his article, the author fully believes that the criminal procedure legislation does not
explain the extended concept of procedural documents in any of its norms. However, if we analyze the current Code of Criminal Procedure, which has the force of law, we can see a number of documents used in criminal proceedings.
At the same time, a number of normative acts specify the documents, their forms and content, but do not specify their concepts. And it is warned to confirm in writing the features of certain actions, but the name of the document is not indicated by law. In this regard, the lack of a legal definition of the extended concept of a procedural document and other ambiguous circumstances in the norms lead to a different interpretation of their content in theory and practice. Also, some procedural documents are not necessarily subject to criminal prosecution.